Silence Broken in UNC
Athletic Scandal
To comment on this
article go to BÕManÕs Revolt.
His name is Rashad McCants, but it might as well
be Terry Malloy, the character played by Marlon Brando in On the
Waterfront. McCants was the second leading
scorer on the UNC basketball team that won the national title in 2005. Now he tells us that he was essentially
a ringer, a sham student making sham superlative grades while not attending a
single class. All he had to do was
to turn in a paper at the end of the semester in UNCÕs notorious African
American Studies (AFAM) program, one that was written for him by a ÒtutorÓ
hired by the athletic department, and the marginal student McCants
found himself on the DeanÕs List. In
the AFAM classes that he actually had to attend and take tests, McCants now tells us, the answers were given to him and his
fellow players in advance by those same tutors.
Like Terry Malloy, ÒYou donÕt do anything and you donÕt say anything,Ó and a really cushy
job was RashadÕs for the enjoyment. All he had to do was to play ball, which
he did well enough not only to help his team win the national championship but
also to get himself selected in the first round of the NBA draft. Now heÕs pushing 30, playing basketball
overseas, and in the immortal words of TerryÕs older brother in the taxi scene
(played by Rod Steiger), heÕs turned Òcheese-eater.Ó
So far, like Terry Malloy, McCants
is very much alone:
In a joint
statement Friday, sixteen players from the 2005 team - including NBA players
Raymond Felton and Marvin Williams, and Final Four Most Outstanding Player Sean
May - defended their Hall of Fame coach.
''With conviction, each one of us is proud to
say that we attended class and did our own academic work,'' the players said.
It didnÕt take Dan Kane of the Raleigh News and Observer very long to pop that particular
bubble
of opposition to the McCants revelations:
Rashad McCants was not the
only UNC menÕs basketball player from the 2005 national championship team who
relied heavily on African studies classes that didnÕt meet, according to
whistleblower Mary Willingham, who tutored athletes
during that period.
Data
she provided to The News & Observer show that five members of that team,
including at least four key players, accounted for a combined 39 enrollments in
classes that have been identified as confirmed or suspected lecture classes
that never met. The data also show that the five athletes accounted for 13
enrollments that were accurately identified as independent studies.
Those classes are also suspect because for much of the last
decade, the department offered far more independent studies than it could
properly supervise, previous reviews have shown.
But
really, what did you expect those teammates of McCants
to say? His charges—that is
to say, his revelations—reflect very badly upon a large number of people,
not the least of whom are the players themselves. I had encountered the same herd instinct
at work in a similar fashion during a previous athletic scandal at UNC. In the spring of 1971 I was a third-year
graduate student at UNC teaching two sections of economic principles. As it happened, I had five football
players in one section and one in the other. Their classwork had gone from acceptable
to non-existent after spring football practice had begun. Calling them aside after all had failed the
second test abysmally, I was treated to one horror
story after another as they described their workday under the grueling regimen
of spring practice, which had begun after the first test. I suggested to my supervising professor
that we register a complaint with the dean of the business school for him to carry
to the university administration because of the way the football program was
undermining our educational mission.
I even went to the student newspaper hoping that they would write an
exposŽ. I was brushed off in each
case.
In
late summer that year, before the beginning of the 1971 season, an offensive
tackle died of heat stroke after the coaches ignored his classic symptoms of a
chill and the cessation of sweating.
A university investigation was done in which the coaching staff was
absolved of all blame. Not long
afterward, a group of former players who had used up their eligibility held a
news conference denouncing the investigation as a whitewash. I have written about the episode in ÒConfessions of a Football Fanatic.Ó Here we pick up the story from that
article:
The faculty
stuck by their report. The coaching staff denied all the charges, and,
admittedly, they were almost impossible to prove. What the eleven
"malcontents and quitters," as they were called by the football
people, most hoped for failed to occur. None of the members of the football
team defected to their ranks. In fact, several, in most manly fashion, shaved
their heads clean as a sign of support for the program, and the tradition
continues even today.
A
week or so later, in an attempt to salvage a losing cause, [the previous yearÕs
defensive captain Bill] Richardson scheduled a bigger, better-publicized news conference.
As the meeting beganÉwith TV cameras whirring the head football coach arrived
from the practice field with the whole team in tow, all in full football armor.
An ugly confrontation occurred. I got there a little late this time and watched
with amazement as 60 or so players, looking stern and formidable, clattered in
their spiked shoes down the steps of the student union. One of them,
bald-headed and mammoth, I barely recognized as one of my students who had
complained most woefully about practice conditions. I had time only to splutter
out, "What are you doing here?" He mumbled something like, "Gotta have a winning season," and rushed out with the
others.
People
who will buck the organization and the peer pressure in situations such as
these are very rare, indeed. Elementary
concerns like truth and justice often take a back seat in the face of the power
exerted by the larger group, and bucking the organization can be very
frustrating and unrewarding, as we see in the case of another very rare
individual, Miguel Rodriguez, the
erstwhile lead investigator for Kenneth Starr in the Vincent Foster death
case. Things eventually turned out
okay for Terry Malloy, but On the
Waterfront was a Hollywood movie of the 1950s in which happy endings were
almost always required. The fate of
Dr. Stockmann in Henrik
IbsenÕs An Enemy of the People
is perhaps more realistic.
He gets labeled with the playÕs title and run out of town after his
discovery that pollution from one of the townÕs two major sources of income, a
tannery, was responsible for illness and death casting a pall over the townÕs
other source of income, tourism.
First academic adviser and researcher, Willingham, and now McCants would appear to be up against the powers that be not
just in North Carolina but also in national college athletics. The National College Athletic Association
(NCAA) has deemed that the AFAM matter in an internal academic problem for UNC
to resolve because the classes were also attended by non-athletes, and an investigation headed by
former governor Jim Martin found Òno specific link between the
scandal and student athletes.Ó So far, in the wake of the McCants
and Willingham charges, the NCAA has continued to exhibit only Òwillful
ignorance.Ó Willingham says that no one from the NCAA has ever even spoken to
her.
With all the news about fraudulent classes for
athletes at UNC, sight seems to have been lost of another layer of corruption
related to the universityÕs major revenue sports, basketball and football. That is the providing of luxury
automobiles to the players and the paying of their copious parking
tickets around campus. That issue
rose to the forefront last summer when the basketball teamÕs leading scorer, PJ
Hairston, was detained by police in Durham driving a rental car that had been
rented in that name of Hayden ÒFatsÓ Thomas, a Durham resident with an
extensive arrest record. The car
also had marijuana inside it and a pistol had been apparently thrown onto the
ground outside it. The members of
the North Carolina State online discussion group Pack Pride have done a lot
more in pursuit of this issue than anyone in the news media has done. A commenter upon an online
article on the subject, who is a likely Pack Pride member, puts the matter in
perspective:
If you actually read the thread, or looked closely at the chart
you posted, you know thereÕs more to it than just PJ HairstonÕs car and pot.
1 – Leslie McDonald mentioned on Twitter that Fats gave
him a cellphone.
2 – Most UNC basketball starters the past few years and a
few UNC football players follow Fats on Twitter.
3 – Fats has established business
connections with wealthy dental surgeons who list UNC sports as major hobbies.
One guy owns several homes in the Triangle and over a dozen cars. Why are these
guys associating with Fats, and why are so many UNC athletes associating with
Fats? What does common sense tell you?
This connection is less than 24 hours old. ItÕs not unexpected
that every connection hasnÕt been proven. And, some are probably dead ends. But
on top of everything else we know about UNC (fake classes, plagiarism, tutors
paying playersÕ parking tickets, tutors being fired by the university and
then personally hired by the football coach, Greg LittleÕs nine cars in one
academic year, license plates provided by a money launderer for a violent
Durham drug gang etc), I think youÕd need to take
crazy pills to ignore or downplay this, not to take it seriously.
Greg Little was a star receiver on the football team now playing
with the Oakland Raiders. He was
suspended for his senior season for lying about various impermissible benefits
that he received. Leslie McDonald
was a senior basketball player who was suspended for a few games over
eligibility questions at the beginning of this past season.
The seriousness of the situation now for UNC is perhaps shown by
who they have chosen to head up yet another internal
investigation. Here is what Dan Kane had to say about
him:
[Kenneth] Wainstein climbed the ranks as a federal
prosecutor after graduating from law school at the University of California at
Berkeley. One of his biggest cases was the conviction of a gang leader on
murder charges after three Starbucks employees were shot dead in WashingtonÕs
normally sedate Georgetown area in 1997. The murders had the city on edge.
The
Ògang leaderÓ heÕs talking about is one Carl Derek Cooper, a hapless petty
criminal now doing life in prison because, in a plea bargain to escape
execution, he was maneuvered into pleading guilty to a crime that he almost
surely did not commit. I call him
the ÒStarbucks Fall-Back Fall
Guy.Ó The intended fall guy, Kenneth Maurice
ÒBooÓ Covington looked like the perfect patsy. After marathon questioning without a
lawyer present, Cooper had implicated Covington, who had a similar drug-dealing
record to CooperÕs. He also knew
one of the victims, which would explain how he gained entry into the store
after it was closed for the night.
But Covington, as it turned out, had an ironclad alibi, so they stuck it
on Cooper.
They never explained how he got into the establishment to pull off his
triple murder botched robbery with those two guns that were never found. A possibly important fact is that one of
the victims—who was shot five times in the face—was
a political activist and the co-founder of an organization called the Lesbian Avengers and had been an intern
in the Clinton White House.
In the wake of the ESPN
interview
of McCants, ÒBubba Cunningham, the UNC athletic
director, released a statement Friday in which he encouraged McCants to speak with Kenneth Wainstein,
a former federal prosecutor UNC hired in January to investigate past issues of
mixing academics and athletics.Ó
I do not
recommend that course of action. It
might not be exactly the same thing as urging Terry Malloy to tell everything
he knew to union boss Johnny FriendlyÕs lawyer, but IÕm afraid itÕs close.
David
Martin
June
11, 2014
Home Page Column Column 5 Archive Contact